Legal Opinion

Young v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 17, 1941No. 9436PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, to whom we shall hereinafter refer as defendant, was convicted of violation of the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act, U.S. Internal Revenue Code, §§ 2551 and 2557, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, §§ 2551, 2557, formerly 26 U.S.C.A. § 1041 and 1047. The indictment contained ten counts, two of which were dismissed upon motion of the defendant. The jury brought in a verdict of guilty upon each of the remaining eight counts, and the present appeal is from the judgment rendered in pursuance of said verdict.

The counts of the indictment are substantially the same, the only…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ratigan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  2. Stetson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  3. Mauk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  4. Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Young v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. QuickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Mannix v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API