Stetson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan; Arthur J. Tuttle, Judge. ' . Frank Stetson was convicted of violating the federal Narcotic Drug Act, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
Stetson was indicted for violating the Harrison Narcotic Drug Act (U. S. Comp. St. 1916, § 6287g et seq.). The indictment contained two counts. The first charged him with engaging in carrying on the business of dealing in and selling morphine, by selling and dispensing the same to persons unknown, without having registered . with °r paid the special tax to the collector of internal revenue, as required by section 1 of the act. The second count charged him with a violation of section 8, in having morphine in his possession *691for purposes of sale without having registered…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Ledbetter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Claassen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McNabb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Manning v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Wagman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
- Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Friedman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.