Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Frank Fernandez
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUMBAULD, Senior District Judge.
The question for decision in this case is whether the District Court 1 was correct in holding that appellant’s claim was barred by the Missouri 2 statute of limitations and that this defense was so clearly meritorious that appellant is subject to sanctions under Rule 11 FRCP 3 for filing suit after being notified by defendant-appellee’s counsel of the existence of the defense. We affirm.
More specifically, the issue is whether the statutory five year period may be tolled by virtue of appellant’s contention that it did not discover defendant’s wrongdoing until a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- A.B. Alexander, an Individual D/B/A A.B. Alexander & Associates v. The Perkin Elmer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States Government ex rel. Houck v. Folding Carton Administration CommitteeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Novelty Textile Mills, Inc. v. SternDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Vista Manufacturing, Inc. v. Trac-4, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1990
- Casamatta v. Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. (In re Freeman-Clay)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2017
- Grant v. Pfizer Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.