Legal Opinion

Durham v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 9, 1977No. 55734PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

Appellant waived trial by jury and entered a plea of guilty before the court to three counts of aggravated robbery. Punishment was assessed at twelve years on each count.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which he states that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). A copy of counsel’s brief and the appellate record have been delivered to appellant and appellant has been advised of his right to file a pro se brief, but none has been filed. We hold that the appeal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Parks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gordon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Buckner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Buckner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Johnjock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Johnjock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API