Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnjock v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 4, 1989No. 6-88-003-CR, 6-88-004-CRPublished

1DissentGrant, Justice

Johnjock correctly contends that he was entitled to two separate assessments of punishment. The unequivocal language of Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 37.07, § 2(c) (Vernon 1981) entitles him to have punishment assessed on each count: “Punishment shall be assessed on each count on which a finding of guilty has been returned.”

The jury was asked to make only one assessment of punishment on a form bearing the numbers of both cases. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 3.03 (Vernon 1974) requires that when cases have been consolidated for trial the sentences shall run concurrently. Since only one assessment of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haliburton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Parks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Durham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API