Goebel v. Lauderdale
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
Appellant Dale Randall Goebel filed suit against respondent James Lauderdale for attorney malpractice. The trial court granted respondent’s motion for nonsuit on the grounds that the action was barred by the one-year statute of limitations and because appellant did not establish a prima facie case of negligence. We conclude that the trial court erred in granting the motion for nonsuit on the issue of respondent’s negligence, and erred in granting the nonsuit based on the running of the statute of limitations.
Factual and Procedural Background
Appellant is a general contractor. In…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Connor v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Smith v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Raber v. TuminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Kirsch v. DuryeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Laird v. BlackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Martinez v. BadisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Sirott v. LattsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Worton v. WortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Turley v. WooldridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.