Legal Opinion
United States v. Schaub
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided August 9, 1958No. A-3838-KPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on a bill to quiet title to property in the Tongass National Forest which the defendants claim under a mineral entry based upon the sand and gravel on said property. The land involved includes a portion of one mining claim and an entire second claim.
The government also seeks a permanent injunction against defendants from digging and excavating upon the land involved or from interfering in any way with the use of said lands by the United States.
The important question to be decided here is whether land containing sand and gravel is subject…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Company v. SoderbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- United States v. SweetSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Mullan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Praeletorian Diamond Oil Ass'n v. GarveyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Anchorage Sand & Gravel Co. v. SchubertDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Watt v. Western Nuclear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Western Nuclear, Inc. v. AndrusDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1979
- Rickelton v. Universal Constructors, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Rickelton v. Universal Constructors, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Watt v. Western Nuclear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983