Legal Opinion
McKinney v. Pedery
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided August 14, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2011-200487; No. 5165PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
In this appeal from the family court, Frank Pedery (Husband) claims the family court improperly terminated Bonnie McKinney’s (Wife) requirement to pay Husband permanent periodic alimony when the court found that Husband continuously cohabitated with his paramour in contravention of section 20-3-130(B)(l) of the South Carolina Code (Supp.2012). In addition, Husband contends the family court erred in failing to award Husband attorney’s fees. We affirm.
FACTS
Husband and Wife divorced on May 3, 2006. In the family court’s final order, it approved an agreement entered into by Husband and Wife,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kiriakides v. United Artists Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Pinckney v. WarrenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- E.D.M. v. T.A.M.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McKinney v. PederySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
- McKinney v. PederySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
- Roof v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015