McKinney v. Pedery
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal
Petitioner Frank J. Pedery argues the court of appeals erred in affirming the family court’s termination of Respondent Bonnie McKinney’s alimony obligation to him and the family court’s failure to award Pedery attorney’s fees. We reverse and remand.
Facts/Procedural Background
Pedery and McKinney divorced on May 3, 2006. In the family court’s final order granting the divorce, the family court approved an agreement entered into by Pedery and McKinney, wherein McKinney agreed to pay Pedery permanent periodic alimony of $1,500 per month. In June 2009, McKinney sought a reduction or termination of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Blumberg v. Nealco, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Atkinson v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stoney v. SRSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- Stoney v. StoneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- Landry v. LandrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020
- Landry v. LandrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020
- Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019