Legal Opinion

Pinckney v. Warren

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 26, 2001No. 25271PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOAL, Chief Justice:

D & S Development (“D & S”) appeals the Master-inEquity’s decision that it does not have an interest in the property sold to it by James L. Pinckney, Jr. (a/k/a “Scrappy Pinckney”). The Master found Scrappy Pinckney did not have a valid interest in the property he sold to D & S because he was illegitimate and, therefore, not his father’s heir at law. We affirm the decision of the Master.

Factual/Procedural Background

Scrappy Pinckney was born on April 19, 1927. He is the son of James Leonard Pinckney and Maggie Richardson. In 1954, James Leonard Pinckney died intestate,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trimble v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Lalli v. LalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Doe v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Wilson v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Freeman v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Sloan v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Mathis v. Brown & Brown of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Binkley v. Rabon Creek Watershed Conservation DistrictCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. GordonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API