Legal Opinion

Quinn v. P & Q SUPERMARKET, INC.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1969No. 691SC476PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

At the outset, it is necessary to determine whether plaintiff’s status at the time of the injury was that of a licensee or an invitee.

“The distinction between a licensee and an invitee does not depend upon whether there is an ‘invitation’ to come on the premises, but is determined by the nature of the business bringing him to the premises, an invitee being a person who goes upon the premises for the mutual benefit of himself and the person in possession, whose visit is of interest or advantage to the invitor, while a licensee is one who goes upon the premises for his own interest, convenience…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Raper v. McCRORY-McLELLAN CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Pafford v. . Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Long v. National Food Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Pafford v. J. A. Jones Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Hedrick Ex Rel. Hedrick v. TigniereSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. SATTERFIELD DEVELOPMENT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Keith v. G. D. Reddick, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Hull v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Farmer v. Wellons Village Shopping Center Drug Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Screaming Eagle Air, Ltd. v. Airport Commission of Forsyth CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API