Legal Opinion
Sedberry v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 15, 1993No. 34A02-9205-PC-231PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDLANDER, Judge.
CASE SUMMARY
Appellant-petitioner Larry Sedberry (Sed-berry) appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief.
We affirm.
FACTS
The facts most favorable to the post conviction court's decision reveal that in July 1987, Sedberry was charged with operating a vehicle while intoxicated,1 a class A misdemeanor. At his initial hearing, he was informed of his constitutional rights, including his right to have an attorney. While he indicated he wished to have an attorney, he stated he could not afford to hire counsel. After a brief examination, the trial judge…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Leonard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Silvers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Kirkham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Lombardo v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hopper v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- Redington v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- David Hopper v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Raber v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Hopper v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.