Legal Opinion
Hopper v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 29, 2011No. 13S01-1007-PC-399PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Petition for Rehearing
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
Appellant David Hopper has been seeking to set aside a 2005 conviction for driv-*615mg while intoxicated, on grounds that he had not been advised or warned of the risks of dealing with prosecutors without a lawyer. We earlier affirmed the trial court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief.
The Attorney General has petitioned for rehearing, arguing that the rule announced in our prior opinion presents an unnecessary and impractical deviation from precedents established by the U.S. Supreme Court, and that it is unsupported by public…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Patterson v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Iowa v. TovarSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- J.A. v. Indiana Department of Child ServicesIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Timothy Hammerlund v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Timothy W. Parish v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Jerome Milian v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Stephen Wirthlin v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.