Kirkham v. State

NEAL, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Defendant-appellant, Daniel Kirkham (Kirkham), appeals his conviction of erimi-nal recklessness before the Monroe Superi- or Court IV.

We reverse.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

On May 12, 1986, an Information was filed in the Monroe Superior Court IV charging Kirkham with criminal recklessness. The Information alleged that Kirk-ham had pointed a firearm at another, creating a substantial risk of bodily harm. On the same day, Kirkham appeared for a mass reading of rights in an initial hearing. At the hearing Kirkham was given an ac-knowledgement of rights form. He read…