Legal Opinion
Urmston v. City of North College Hill
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 29, 1961No. 8939PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The defendant-appellant in this case is a municipal corporation. The plaintiff-appellee is the owner of certain real property on Hamilton Avenue in the municipal corporation (North College Hill, Ohio).
In 1929, the municipal corporation passed a general zoning-ordinance in which all real property was classified either as business or as residential. The property of the plaintiff was classified as residential. There have been several amendments made to the zoning ordinance, but none of them has affected the plaintiff’s property, so it still remains residential. And there is a residence said to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Smith v. HollenbeckWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Webb v. DameronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
- Smith v. CollisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Herbert Harvey, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Bayshore Sew. Co. v. Dep't. of Env., NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Brown v. WellsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Central Maine Power Co. v. Waterville Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
- Leslie v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.