Legal Opinion

Aimonetto v. Rapid Gas, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1964No. File 10077PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHomeyer, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant on an insufficient funds check for $5,000. At the close of plaintiff's case in chief defendant moved for a directed verdict which motion was denied. At the close of all the testimony both parties moved for a directed verdict without reserving the right to go to the jury on any fact question involved in the suit. The trial judge denied the motion of the defendant and directed the jury to return a verdict in favor of plaintiff. SDC 1960 Supp. 33.1315(3). We review on the basis that the decision of the trial judge must be sustained unless the clear preponderance of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Merrill v. HurleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  2. McKiver v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Honrath v. New York Life InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Garey v. Kelvinator Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Engler v. Ipswich Printing Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Don M. Davis, as of the Estate of Ethlyn M. Davis, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  2. Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. RossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Charnes v. Central City Opera House Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. Pokela v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. (In Re Dakota Country Store Foods, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1989
  5. Contract Materials Co. v. Oahe Land & Cattle Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API