Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Young v. Babcock

California Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1896No. S. F. No. 413PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This is an appeal from a final judgment in favor of defendant upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint of the relator. The complaint may be epitomized thus: 1. Andrew J. Moulder, the duly elected, qualified, and acting superintendent of schools for the city and county of San Francisco, died on the fourteenth day of October, 1895, whereby the office of such super*560intendent of schools became vacant; 2. On the fourth day of November, 1895, the plaintiff, Charles S. Young, was, by the board of supervisors of said city and county of San Francisco, appointed superintendent of schools in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomason v. AshworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. In re GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Ex parte KeeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Wood v. Board of Election CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. In re CarrilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pearcy v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. People ex rel. Webster v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Rosello-Bras v. American RailroadSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API