Legal Opinion

Ex parte Keeney

California Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1890No. 20660PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in. the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

Petitioner, who is health officer of the city and county of San Francisco, is arrested and held under a warrant issued out of the police court of said city and county, upon a complaint charging him with misdemeanor, for that he, “as such health officer, did grant and issue a permit to deposit the body of said Ah Tin in the city cemetery, in said city and county of San Francisco, and to inter said body in said city and county, ■without requiring, receiving or obtaining, or filing, and without the issuance of the certificate of the death of said Ah Tin, signed or issued by an attending…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Davidson v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In re BerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Stanislaus County Dairymen's Protective Ass'n v. County of StanislausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. People Ex Rel. Lawlor v. WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. In Re McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API