Legal Opinion
George Hyman Construction Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 16, 1985No. 84-1226PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELSON, Associate Judge:
The District of Columbia Department of Employment Services (DOES) determined that claimant worker’s myocardial infarction was an injury arising out of employment and that claimant is therefore eligible for workers’ compensation pursuant to D.C.Code §§ 36-301 to -345 (1981 & 1984 Supp.). Petitioner George Hyman Construction Company challenges both that determination and DOES’ computation of claimant’s average weekly wage under id. § 36-311(a)(4). We affirm.
I
Claimant, John T. Rose, filed a workers’ compensation claim for disability caused by a myocardial infarction that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Gomillion v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Saunders v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by14 opinions
- Oubre v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Spartin v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Jones v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Mills v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- United Parcel Service v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.