State v. Huck, Unpublished Decision (12-7-2001)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
Gary Huck appeals his sentence and designation as a sexual predator by the Washington County Court of Common Pleas. Huck asserts that the trial court's determination that he is a sexual predator is against the manifest weight of the evidence. Because we find that some competent, credible evidence supports the trial court's determination that Huck is a sexual predator, we disagree. Huck also asserts that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences for two counts of sexual battery, a violation of R.C. 2907.03(A). Because we find that the trial court failed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. EdmonsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.