Legal Opinion

State v. Huck, Unpublished Decision (12-7-2001)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 2001No. Case No. 01CA1Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY

Gary Huck appeals his sentence and designation as a sexual predator by the Washington County Court of Common Pleas. Huck asserts that the trial court's determination that he is a sexual predator is against the manifest weight of the evidence. Because we find that some competent, credible evidence supports the trial court's determination that Huck is a sexual predator, we disagree. Huck also asserts that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences for two counts of sexual battery, a violation of R.C. 2907.03(A). Because we find that the trial court failed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. EdmonsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API