Allstate Insurance Co. v. Ramos
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
The principal question presented in this appeal is whether the trial judge properly declined to disturb a jury award of $45,000 in favor of the plaintiff, Ruth Ramos, under the uninsured motorist provisions of a policy issued by Allstate Insurance Company to Ms. Ramos’ husband, Jose Cleto Munoz. In a post-trial motion ostensibly filed pursuant to Super. Ct. Civ. R. 59(e), Allstate alleged for the first time that the uninsured motorist protections on which Ms. Ramos based her claim were limited by the terms of the policy to $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Wallace v. Warehouse Employees Union No. 730District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re J.D.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Reese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Perry v. SeraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Flax v. SchertlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- District No. 1-Pacific Coast District v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Rhodes v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Kvamme v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Smith v. SummersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.