Legal Opinion
Frantz Manufacturing Co. v. Phenix Manufacturing Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided January 20, 1970No. 67-C-335PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.
The plaintiff brought this action under 35 U.S.C. § 281 for the infringement of three of its patents: mechanical patents numbered 3,104,699 and 3,169,-612 and design patent numbered 194,094. By stipulation of the parties, the complaint as to the patent numbered 3,104,-699 has been dismissed. In its answer, the defendant Phenix asks for declaratory relief, asserting the invalidity of the two patents remaining in litigation. Although the defendant in its counterclaim asked for relief under the antitrust laws, such request for relief was withdrawn by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Monolith Portland Midwest Company, a Nevada Corporation v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Deep Welding, Inc. v. Sciaky Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Southern States Equipment Corp. v. Usco Power Equipment Corp. Usco Power Equipment Corp. v. Southern States Equipment CorpCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Tool Research and Engineering Corporation v. Honcor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Frantz Manufacturing Company, and v. Phenix Manufacturing Company, Inc., AndCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Shelco, Inc. v. Dow Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970