Frantz Manufacturing Company, and v. Phenix Manufacturing Company, Inc., And
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEVENS, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff originally alleged that defendant’s overhead garage doors infringed two mechanical patents and a design patent. Before trial the parties stipulated that the earlier mechanical patent (’699) 1 was not infringed. With respect to the later mechanical patent (’612), 2 the questions are whether the district court, 307 F.Supp. 822, properly construed 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) in holding that the invention was in public use more than a year before the patent application was filed, and if so, whether he properly rejected plaintiff’s alternative contention that the ’612…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Smith & Griggs Manufacturing Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Timely Products Corporation, Raphael J. Costanzo v. Stanley ArronCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Trio Process Corporation, in No. 71-1295 v. L. Goldstein's Sons, Inc., in No. 71-1296Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Twm Manufacturing Company, Inc., and Turner Quick-Lift Corporation, Plaintiffs v. Dura Corporation and Kidde, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Tp Laboratories, Inc. v. Professional Positioners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.