Legal Opinion

People v. Porter

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1988No. 63274; 63384, 63716 consPublishedCited by 216 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ryan

Defendants, Marva Mason, a/k/a Linda Wells, Aaron Porter, and Nathaniel Singleton, filed separate post-conviction petitions and motions for appointment of counsel to represent them on their petitions in the separate cases in the circuit court of Cook County. All three petitions were dismissed as “patently without merit” pursuant to section 122 — 2.1 of the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 38, par. 122 — 2.1) without appointment of counsel. In cause No. 63716 (Mason), the appellate court, first district, fourth division, held that section 122 — 2.1 is unconstitutional…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. People v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Rodriquez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by216 opinions

  1. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. FloresIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. GaultneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

211 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API