Legal Opinion

Barnett v. City of San Jose

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 21, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01383Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DAVID BARNETT et al., Case No. 18-cv-01383-JD 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 49 10 CITY OF SAN JOSE, Defendant. 11 12 13 In March 2018, over 300 firefighter employees working for the City of San Jose filed 14 seven related actions1 alleging that San Jose violated the overtime compensation requirement of 15 the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). See 28 U.S.C. § 207;

29 C.F.R. § 553.230. The cases 16 were stayed during an appeal of a summary judgment order against the plaintiffs in a similar 17…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Newcal Industries, Inc. v. IKON Office SolutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Greg Landers v. Quality Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API