Legal Opinion

Ward v. Vantell

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided September 21, 2022No. 1:22-cv-01170Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION RANDALL WARD, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 1:22-cv-01170-STA-jay ) MARTIN FRINK, ) ) Respondent. ) ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS, GRANTING PETITIONER LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PETITION, DENYING MOTION TO EXPEDITE AS MOOT, AND DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND FORM Petitioner Randall Ward has filed a pro se habeas corpus petition (the “Petition”), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) The pleading is before the Court for initial review. See Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Christopher MacHacek v. Gerald Hofbauer, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. Gray v. Attorney General for State of TennCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. Alvin MooreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  5. Gray v. RoseDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API