Legal Opinion

Gray v. Rose

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided April 17, 1985No. Civ. A. No. 3:83-0007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDA OPINIONS, FINDING, CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CERTIFICATE OF PROBABLE CAUSE

NEESE, Senior District Judge, Sitting by Designation and Assignment.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit directed this Court: (1) to consider an amended petition for the federal writ of habeas corpus, a response thereto by the respondents, and the record of the proceedings in the state courts; (2) either to accept the findings-of-fact made by the state court(s) or determine its own findings-of-fact under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); and (3) then to resolve the remaining legal issues by applying the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bridges v. Kohl's Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
  2. Crews v. DickersonDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021
  3. Ferguson v. State of TennesseeDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2024
  4. Ward v. VantellDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2022
  5. Ward v. VantellDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API