Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Baldwin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 12, 1979No. CA 79-81Published

1ConcurrenceJames H. Pilkinton, Judge

I concur in the results reached by the majority for the following reasons. Immediately after this suit was filed, and Mr. Baldwin was notified as provided by law, he conveyed his interest in this Arkansas property to Roland J. Bellard, his Texas attorney. This was probably a thinly veiled effort to hinder or defeat any claim Mrs. Baldwin might make for past due child support. Be that as it may, it is clear that thereafter both Mr. Baldwin and Mr. Bellard entered their appearance in this case. Their answer, and all other pleadings filed by them, are general and not limited. In addition, they…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Funk v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Southern Pac. Co. v. ZehnleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  4. Pulaski County v. HortonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  5. Church v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API