Legal Opinion

Church v. Jones

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 26, 1925PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). The court told the jury that it was the contention of Church that, at the time of the execution of the note sued on, he and Jones had a full and complete settlement of their accounts. That, on the other hand, Jones admitted the execution of the note, and that the amount sued for had not been paid; but he claimed that Church owed him more than the amount of the note, and denied that they had had a full settlement of their accounts at the time the note was executed. In other instructions the court submitted the respective theories of the parties to the jury.

Th…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coats v. MilnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pulaski County v. HortonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. May v. Exxon CorporationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  3. Troxler v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  4. Smiley v. SmileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. Martin v. RomesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API