Legal Opinion

Morris Plan Co. v. Miller

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1918PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Motion by the judgment debtor, William Gf. Miller, to vacate an order of garnishment under section 1391 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the CourtSears, J.

The judgment debtor moves to vacate a garnishment order under section 1391 of the Code of Civil Procedure because of the following facts: The *471judgment debtor is a resident of Pennsylvania where he is employed by the Welch Grape Juice Company, a New York corporation which has a factory in Pennsylvania where the judgment debtor works and also has a factory in the state of New York. The Welch Grape Juice Company pays the judgment debtor in Pennsylvania; all his work has been performed in Pennsylvania except during the autumn of 1917 when the judgment debtor worked for the Welch Grape Juice…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Douglass v. Phenix InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. National Broadway Bank v. . SampsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Carr v. CorcoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. Bridges v. WadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  5. Flynn v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morris Plan Ind. Bank of N.Y. v. GunningNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Commercial Credit Corp. v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  3. Carpenter v. FarabaughCity of New York Municipal Court · 1933
  4. Salm v. Krieg, New York County Courts1944
  5. State Tax Commission v. BradleyNew York Supreme Court · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API