Legal Opinion
Salm v. Krieg
New York County Courts
Decided July 25, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConstob, J.
This decision involves the constitutionality of section 916 of the Civil Practice Act, as amended by chapter 625 of the Laws of 1940. ’ The particular question involved has never been passed upon by the courts of the State since the amendment.
Heretofore the plaintiff and judgment creditor, Heinz Salm, obtained a judgment against Michael Kreig who was then a resident of the city of Hudson and State of New York, in the City Court of the City of Hudson, and a transcript of judgment was thereafter filed, making said judgment a judgment of the County Court. On the 25th day of January, 1944, there…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Douglass v. Phenix InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Plimpton v. . BigelowNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- National Broadway Bank v. . SampsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Cohn v. Enterprise Distributing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Dos Passos v. MortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Monteiro v. Sociedad Mar. San Nicolas, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Schaefer v. SchaeferNew York Supreme Court · 1959