Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Peniston

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1972No. 25554PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHANGLER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff contractor agreed to paint the defendant’s fence, a half-mile length of 242 round cedar posts set ten feet apart, strung with barbed and woven wire and inter-sticed by three frame gates and some pan-elling. This undertaking was arranged by Hottle, defendant’s farm manager, and required only that the best possible result be achieved with one coat of paint. The kind of paint to be used and the method of performance, whether by hand brush or by spray, were left to plaintiff Hicks. Compensation for the work, it was agreed, was to' be based on labor time and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fisher v. GunnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Rossomanno v. Laclede Cab CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Schmitt v. PierceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  4. Kitchen v. WilsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pepsi Midamerica v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Tri-State Motor Transit Co. v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Bradley v. BuffingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Finkel v. Hoel-Steffen Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Ralston Purina Co. v. RyderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API