Legal Opinion
In re Titanium Dioxide Antitrust Litigation
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 26, 2013No. Civil Action No. RDB-10-0318PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge.
This class action concerns an alleged price-fixing conspiracy in the market for titanium dioxide.1 The Plaintiff class representatives Haley Paint Company, Isaac Industries, Inc., and East Coast Colorants, LLC, doing business as Breen Color Concentrates, and the class of titanium dioxide purchasers whom they represent (together, “Plaintiffs”) claim that Defendants Kronos Worldwide Inc. (“Kronos”), and Cristal USA Inc., formerly known as Millennium Inorganic Chemicals, Inc. (“Millennium”), together with E.I. du Pont de Nemours & *845Co.…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Innova Hospital San Antonio, L.P. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
- Kleen Products LLC v. International PaperDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Valspar Corp. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
- In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.