Legal Opinion

Abraham v. Selig

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 21, 1939PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODDARD, District Judge.

It is true that plaintiffs Howard M. Ernst and Bertram S. Rosenbaum, describe themselves as “co-partners doing business under the firm name and style of Ernst & Co.”, but a partnership is not strictly a legal entity.

Plaintiffs, Ernst and Rosenbaum with others, are suing in their individual capacity to enforce rights which they assert they have as joint owners of the assets of Ernst & Co., a co-partnership. They are parties to the suit and have submitted themselves individually to the jurisdiction of this court. While their counsel contend to the contrary' they have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lesnik v. Public Industrials CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Scott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. Hansbarger v. CookWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Edmonds v. LuptonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Burg v. HornDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API