Legal Opinion

Edmonds v. Lupton

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 3, 1969No. [No. 175, September Term, 1968.]PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

This appeal involves the construction of Maryland Rule 314 a 1, with particular reference to whether or not the “bill of com plaint” or petition filed by the appellees, Thomas F. Lupton and Laura Lee Lupton, his wife (the Luptons), in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, against the appellant Elizabeth H. Edmunds, Conservatrix of the Estate of Vivian G. Edmunds, asserted a “claim” against the conservatrix, and whether or not the appellant and appellees were “opposing parties” within the meaning of Rule 314 a 1.

The appellant was appointed as conservatrix of the estate of Vivian G. Edmunds…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. White v. FrielCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  2. Frush v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  3. Funger v. Mayor of SomersetCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Isenberg v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  5. First National Bank in Dodge City v. Johnson County National Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. East v. GilchristCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. Higgins v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Group Health Ass'n v. BlumenthalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Haupt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. DeLeon v. SlearCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API