State v. Delaoz
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Dissent
Burgess, J.,
¶ 50. dissenting in part. Certainly defendant’s sentence requires clarification. Intentionally or not, the district court misspoke when it imposed a 4-year-and-11-month-to-5-year sentence “all suspended but 5 years” to serve, which would seem to defeat the statutory prohibition on identical minimum and maximum terms. See 13 V.S.A. § 7031(a) (mandating that the court “shall not fix the term of imprisonment, . . . but shall establish a maximum and may establish a minimum term”). The majority, however, reaches beyond any argument offered by defendant to invalidate his minimum term,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re Conditional Discharge of ConvictsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901
- Smith v. ParrottSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- State v. CorlissSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- State v. BaronSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.