Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Delaoz

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 18, 2011No. 2009-001Published

1Dissent

Burgess, J.,

¶ 50. dissenting in part. Certainly defendant’s sentence requires clarification. Intentionally or not, the district court misspoke when it imposed a 4-year-and-11-month-to-5-year sentence “all suspended but 5 years” to serve, which would seem to defeat the statutory prohibition on identical minimum and maximum terms. See 13 V.S.A. § 7031(a) (mandating that the court “shall not fix the term of imprisonment, . . . but shall establish a maximum and may establish a minimum term”). The majority, however, reaches beyond any argument offered by defendant to invalidate his minimum term,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re Conditional Discharge of ConvictsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901
  2. Smith v. ParrottSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  3. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  4. State v. CorlissSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  5. State v. BaronSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API