Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 15, 2002No. 01-263 & 01-396PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Amestoy, C J.

This consolidated appeal asks the Court to decide whether a defendant convicted of a sex offense is required to register as a sex offender pursuant to Vermont’s Sex Offender Registration Act, when sentencing has been deferred pursuant to 13 V.S.A. § 7041. We hold that such registration is required.

In July 2000, defendant Thompson was charged with lewd and lascivious conduct with a minor in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 2602. In April 2001, pursuant to a plea agreement, Thompson pled guilty to an amended charge of lewd and lascivious conduct, in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 2601, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tarrant v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. State v. PickensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  3. In Re Wal Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  4. State v. YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. CostelloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. Stephanie BerardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
  2. State v. KenvinSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  3. City of Montpelier v. Barnett, Sanborn and Natural Resources BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  4. State v. KimmickSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. State v. Shannon Rajda / State v. Albert Lee Lape, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API