State v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
Amestoy, C J.
This consolidated appeal asks the Court to decide whether a defendant convicted of a sex offense is required to register as a sex offender pursuant to Vermont’s Sex Offender Registration Act, when sentencing has been deferred pursuant to 13 V.S.A. § 7041. We hold that such registration is required.
In July 2000, defendant Thompson was charged with lewd and lascivious conduct with a minor in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 2602. In April 2001, pursuant to a plea agreement, Thompson pled guilty to an amended charge of lewd and lascivious conduct, in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 2601, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tarrant v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- State v. PickensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- In Re Wal Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- State v. YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. CostelloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. Stephanie BerardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- State v. KenvinSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- City of Montpelier v. Barnett, Sanborn and Natural Resources BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- State v. KimmickSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- State v. Shannon Rajda / State v. Albert Lee Lape, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.