Legal Opinion
Fuhr v. School Dist. of City of Hazel Park
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 2, 2001No. 2:99-cv-76360PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
STEEH, District Judge.
This case arises out of plaintiff Geraldine Fuhr’s allegation of sexual discrimination by defendant School District of the City of Hazel Park. Plaintiffs allegation of discrimination stems from the fact that she was passed over for the position of boys varsity basketball coach in favor of a male teacher. Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment, which this court DENIES for the reasons stated below.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff was hired at Hazel Park High School (“HPHS”) as a social studies teacher and coach in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Geraldine Fuhr v. Hazel Park School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Pietrowski v. Merchants & Medical Credit Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Geraldine Fuhr v. Hazel Park School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013