Legal Opinion

Pietrowski v. Merchants & Medical Credit Corp.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 25, 2008No. 06-CV-12718PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S PETITION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S PETITION FOR ATTORNEY FEES

ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge.

Pending before the court are cross-petitions for attorney’s fees and costs filed by Plaintiff Veronica Pietrowski on November 27, 2007 and Defendant Merchants & Medical Credit Corporation on December 5, 2007. The petitions have been fully briefed and the court concludes that a hearing is unnecessary. See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(e)(2). For the following reasons, the court will grant Defendant’s petition and deny Plaintiffs petition.

I. BACKGROUND

This…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doe v. Rutherford County, Tennessee, Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2015
  2. Wolschlager v. Law Offices of Mitchell D. BluhmDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2017
  3. Robinson v. Michigan, State ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API