Osburn v. Maata
Oregon Supreme Court
Prom Clatsop: Jambs A. Eakin, Judge. Department 2. This is a suit by A. Osburn and W. R. Chisholm against Edastiina Maata and others. Prom a default decree,' and an order denying a motion to set aside such decree, the defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean
This is an application to set aside a default decree and allow the defendants to answer. The trial court denied the motion, and the defendants appeal from the order and decree.
The plaintiffs allege that they are the owners in fee simple of a certain quarter-section of land in Clatsop County, Oregon; that defendants claim some interest or estate in the same. Plaintiffs seek to have their title quieted. Service of summons was attempted to be made by publication. The trial court ordered the same to be published for eight weeks in the “Weekly Astorian.” It was recited in the summons, as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McMinn v. WhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Odell v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1881
- Mayer v. MayerOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Rafferty v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Taylor v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sund & Co. v. Flagg & Standifer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
- McDonald v. SuppleOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Woodburn Lodge No. 102 v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Herrick v. WallaceOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Rockwood v. TurnerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.