Legal Opinion
Fistere, Inc. v. Helz
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 15, 1967No. 4008PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Judge:
Appellee (plaintiff below) sued to recover a refund allegedly due from appellants under a contract for 650 hours of dancing lessons. The total cost of the course, $6,435, had been paid.
The contract in question was a printed form with blank spaces to be filled in for such matters as the total number of hours, price, down payment, and the date when the balance was due. It is not disputed that it was executed in triplicate, by means of carbon paper, and was signed by appellee and by Pat Patrick, the manager of the dance studio. The printed form included the following clause:
“I…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vincent B. Welch v. Robert W. SherwinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Killeen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Etty v. Federal Consulting Service, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
3Cited by7 opinions
- Affordable Elegance Travel, Inc. v. Worldspan, L.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Stamenich v. MarkovicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Piedmont Resolution, LLC v. Johnston, Rivlin & FoleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Segal Wholesale, Inc. v. United Drug ServiceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Walker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.