Legal Opinion

Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 1, 1941No. 43654PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLittleton, Judge

If plaintiff is entitled to recover interest on the amounts, due it and allowed by legal authority and withheld by the Comptroller General, the amount due it is $35,821.78. Whitbeck, Receiver of L-W-F Engineering Co., Inc., v. United States, 77 C. Cls. 309; Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville-Railway Co. a Corporation, v. United States, 78 C. Cls. 96. (Certiorari denied, 290 U. S. 671, in each case.) Plaintiff contends, however, that these decisions did not correctly interpret and apply the Act of March 3, 1875, after it was amended March 3, 1933, and insists that the act as it stood before…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Angarica v. BayardSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Tillson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Cherokee Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Harvey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Whitbeck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  2. United States v. Mescalero Apache TribeUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  3. The Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. J.L. Simmons Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. The Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API