Legal Opinion

Whitbeck v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 10, 1933No. F-32PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLittletoN, Judge

The broad question in this case is whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover any amount under either or both of the contracts, no. 555 with the Army, and no. 57340 with the Navy, for the construction of airplanes. If recovery can be had the questions arise as to the items on which he is entitled to recover under each of the contracts.

Plaintiff contends with reference to Army contract no. 555 that the defendant breached the same by failing and refusing to make all the biweekly payments of $2,000 each absolutely provided to be made under art. Y (2) thereof; that it also breached the contract…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Anvil Mining Co. v. HumbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. College Point Boat Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Northern Helex Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  2. A. Ernest Fitzgerald v. Elmer B. StaatsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  3. American Potash Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  4. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
  5. Aluminum Co. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API