Legal Opinion

Schuenemeyer v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 20, 1985No. 329-81CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES, EXPENSES, AND COSTS

WHITE, Senior Judge.

After receiving a favorable decision on the cause of action set out in his complaint (see the court’s opinion and order dated March 6, 1984, 4 Cl.Ct. 649), the plaintiff, a pro se litigant, timely filed an application for attorneys’ fees, expenses, and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (28 U.S.C. § 2412 (1982)) and pursuant to RUSCC 81(e).

In his application, the plaintiff requested reimbursement for: attorneys’ fees in the amounts of $4,223.58 and $600 paid to Attorneys Keith A. Rosenberg…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. BROAD AVENUE LAUNDRY AND TAILORING, Petitioner, v. the UNITED STATES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  2. Leroy H. Ellis v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. James A. Bailey v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Schuenemeyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  5. Schuenemeyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pototzky v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API