Schuenemeyer v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES, EXPENSES, AND COSTS
WHITE, Senior Judge.
After receiving a favorable decision on the cause of action set out in his complaint (see the court’s opinion and order dated March 6, 1984, 4 Cl.Ct. 649), the plaintiff, a pro se litigant, timely filed an application for attorneys’ fees, expenses, and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (28 U.S.C. § 2412 (1982)) and pursuant to RUSCC 81(e).
In his application, the plaintiff requested reimbursement for: attorneys’ fees in the amounts of $4,223.58 and $600 paid to Attorneys Keith A. Rosenberg…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- BROAD AVENUE LAUNDRY AND TAILORING, Petitioner, v. the UNITED STATES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Leroy H. Ellis v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- James A. Bailey v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Schuenemeyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Schuenemeyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pototzky v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985