Legal Opinion
Washington v. HOVENSA LLC
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 21, 2011No. 10-2328PublishedCited by 508 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
(July 21, 2011)
RENDELL, Circuit Judge
In this appeal, we review the District Court’s grant of defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction based on its determination that plaintiff Gloria Washington was domiciled in the Virgin Islands at the time she filed her complaint against defendants Hovensa, LLC (“Hovensa”) and Triangle Construction and Maintenance, Inc. (“Triangle”), notwithstanding her insistence that she was domiciled in Texas. In reviewing a district court’s conclusion regarding where a party is domiciled, our review is for clear error as…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Vlandis v. KlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Southern Cross Overseas Agencies, Inc. v. Wah Kwong Shipping Group Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- George S. Krasnov v. Brendan DinanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by508 opinions
- GBForefront LP v. Forefront Management Group LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Strabala v. ZhangDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Peace Church Risk Retention Gr v. Johnson Controls Fire ProtectiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Prater v. Am. Heritage Fed. Credit UnionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Carolyn Freidrich v. Thomas DavisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
503 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.