Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Schmitz
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 19, 2002No. 3:99CV1738 (JBA)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT [DOC. # 61]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Defendants move to enforce a settlement agreement reached in August of 2001 with Attorney James Fischer (“Fischer”), plaintiffs former counsel of record in this case. Johnson vigorously maintains that he never agreed and never told Fischer that he agreed to the terms of the settlement agreement and that therefore it is not enforceable against him. On August 19, 2002, the Court held an evidentiary hearing on defendants’ motion, and solicited additional briefing from the parties. The Court concludes…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Tomlinson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Louis Fennell v. Tlb Kent Company and Joseph PietrykaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,422 Harry Plummer, Cross-Appellant v. Lederle Laboratories, Division of American Cyanamid Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Omega Engineering, Inc. v. Omega, S.A., Docket No. 04-5084-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Ryder v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Seaport Capital Partners, LLC v. Speer (In re Speer)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Bahl v. New York Institute of TechnologyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- Burckhardt v. OlschafaskieDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.