Legal Opinion

McEntire v. Malloy

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 21, 1986No. 85-313PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

The question presented in this appeal is whether the statute of limitations began to run when the battery was allegedly committed or when the extent of resulting injuries was discovered. We hold it began to run when the tort was allegedly committed, and thus the judge was correct in dismissing the action.

Margaret McEntire had silicone implants placed in her breasts in 1978. She was, at that time, married to the appellee. Her complaint alleged that in 1982 she was severely beaten by the appellee, and the battery caused an implant to burst, leak, and result in serious…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Everhart v. Rich's, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  5. Field v. Gazette Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jones v. Trustees of Bethany CollegeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Martin v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. State v. Diamond Lakes Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Medical Liability Mutual Insurance v. Alan Curtis LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. Howard v. Northwest Arkansas Surgical Clinic, P.A.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API