Legal Opinion

Einstein v. Climax Cycle Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion to set aside an attachment.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

The motion to set aside the attachment in this action, being made by a junior attaching creditor, must be founded upon a strict legal right, or it cannot be granted. It is not made for *89any irregularity, but upon the claim that the affidavit for the attachment was entirely insufficient to justify a process by which the defendant’s property might be seized in advance of judgment. The affidavit is. made by the assignee of the claim. Two jurisdictional averments were essential to support his application. First, the facts constituting the cause of action, and,- secondly, the non-residence of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crowns v. VailNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Hoorman v. Climax Cycle Co.New York Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Foster v. RogersNew York Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Herman v. BaileyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
  3. Altworth v. FlynnAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
  4. Altworth v. FlynnAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API