Legal Opinion

Foster v. Rogers

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to vacate an attachment for insufficiency of the papers on which it was granted.

1Opinion of the CourtLeventritt, J.

This is a motion to vacate an attachment for insufficiency of the papers on which it was granted. The single affidavit is made by the plaintiff, who swears: “ I know the defendant in this action, and I am personally familiar with all the transactions hereaftfer set forth, and make the statements herein contained of my own personal knowledge.” The cause of action is then stated, and is, in substance, that on the 18th day of December, 1899, the defendant, for value received, made and delivered his certain promissory note in writing, whereby he promised to pay to the order of the firm of Payson,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crowns v. VailNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Ladenburg v. Commercial Bank of NewfoundlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Tucker v. E. L. Goodsell Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Einstein v. Climax Cycle Co.New York Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Martin v. Aluminum Compound Plate Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Geduld v. BaltimoreAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
  2. Warfield v. Wire Wheel Corp. of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API