Legal Opinion
Bramson v. Chester L. Jordan & Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 14, 1977PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POMEROY, Justice.
“[A] complaint should not be dismissed for insufficiency unless it appears to a certainty that plaintiff is entitled to no relief under any state of facts which could be proved in support of the claim.” 2A Moore’s Federal Practice § 12.08 (2d ed.), cited with approval in Richards v. Ellis, Me., 233 A.2d 37, 38 (1967). As Section 12.11 of the Commentary to rule 12(b)(6) in Field, McKusick & Wroth, Maine Civil Practice (2d ed. 1970) clearly points up “[t]he ‘showing’ that the pleader is entitled to relief must be made, but it may be in general terms which would not have…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nelson v. TimesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- Jones v. BillingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Richards v. EllisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- Beckett v. RoderickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
- Dom J. Moreau & Son, Inc. v. Federal Pacific Electric Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nadeau v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- MacKerron v. MaduraSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Kenney Manufacturing Co. v. Starkweather & Shepley, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
- Teel v. ColsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- County Forest Products, Inc. v. Green Mountain Agency, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.