Legal Opinion

Bramson v. Chester L. Jordan & Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 14, 1977PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POMEROY, Justice.

“[A] complaint should not be dismissed for insufficiency unless it appears to a certainty that plaintiff is entitled to no relief under any state of facts which could be proved in support of the claim.” 2A Moore’s Federal Practice § 12.08 (2d ed.), cited with approval in Richards v. Ellis, Me., 233 A.2d 37, 38 (1967). As Section 12.11 of the Commentary to rule 12(b)(6) in Field, McKusick & Wroth, Maine Civil Practice (2d ed. 1970) clearly points up “[t]he ‘showing’ that the pleader is entitled to relief must be made, but it may be in general terms which would not have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nelson v. TimesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  2. Jones v. BillingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  3. Richards v. EllisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  4. Beckett v. RoderickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
  5. Dom J. Moreau & Son, Inc. v. Federal Pacific Electric Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nadeau v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. MacKerron v. MaduraSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  3. Kenney Manufacturing Co. v. Starkweather & Shepley, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  4. Teel v. ColsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  5. County Forest Products, Inc. v. Green Mountain Agency, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API